OpenAI

Use OpenAI as the judge LLM for evaluations with the arize-phoenix-evals library.

The arize-phoenix-evals library uses an LLM-as-judge to grade model output — hallucinations, factuality, helpfulness, toxicity, custom rubrics. Plug OpenAI in as the judge by passing provider="openai" to the LLM(...) wrapper, then build a create_classifier(...) evaluator and run it over a DataFrame with evaluate_dataframe(...).

Prerequisites

• Python 3.11+
• An OPENAI_API_KEY from the OpenAI Platform

Install

pip install arize-phoenix-evals openai pandas

Configure credentials

export OPENAI_API_KEY="<your-openai-api-key>"

Setup the eval LLM

# eval_setup.py
from phoenix.evals import LLM

# `LLM(provider=..., model=...)` reads the appropriate provider key
# from the environment — OPENAI_API_KEY for OpenAI.
llm = LLM(provider="openai", model="gpt-5.5")

Use gpt-5.4-mini for a cheaper judge if you’re evaluating large batches; the judge’s job is classification, not generation, so a smaller model is often sufficient.

Run an evaluation

This example builds a hallucination classifier and grades two sample question/answer pairs against a reference. The pattern generalizes: replace the prompt template, choices, and DataFrame columns with whatever metric you want to evaluate.

# example.py
import pandas as pd

from phoenix.evals import LLM, create_classifier, evaluate_dataframe

llm = LLM(provider="openai", model="gpt-5.5")

HALLUCINATION_PROMPT = """\
Determine whether the answer below is factually supported by the
reference. Reply with exactly one of: factual, hallucinated.

Question: {input}
Answer: {output}
Reference: {reference}
"""

evaluator = create_classifier(
    name="hallucination",
    prompt_template=HALLUCINATION_PROMPT,
    llm=llm,
    # `choices` maps each label the LLM may emit to a numeric score.
    # `direction="maximize"` (the default) means higher score is better.
    choices={"factual": 1.0, "hallucinated": 0.0},
)

df = pd.DataFrame([
    {
        "input":     "What is the capital of France?",
        "output":    "Paris is the capital of France.",
        "reference": "Paris is the capital and most populous city of France.",
    },
    {
        "input":     "What is the capital of France?",
        "output":    "Berlin is the capital of France.",
        "reference": "Paris is the capital and most populous city of France.",
    },
])

results = evaluate_dataframe(dataframe=df, evaluators=[evaluator])

# `hallucination_score` is a Score row (a dict-like with `score`, `label`,
# `explanation`, …) — pull the numeric out for a flat display column.
results["score"] = results["hallucination_score"].apply(lambda r: r["score"])
print(results[["input", "output", "score"]].to_string())

Expected output

                            input                            output  score
0  What is the capital of France?   Paris is the capital of France.    1.0
1  What is the capital of France?  Berlin is the capital of France.    0.0

The full returned DataFrame also includes hallucination_execution_details (status + exceptions + timing) and the original hallucination_score column with each evaluator result’s full dict (name, score, label, explanation, metadata, kind, direction) — useful for surfacing the LLM’s reasoning, persisting eval rows back to Arize AX, or filtering retries.

Troubleshooting

• 401 from OpenAI. Verify OPENAI_API_KEY is set and has access to gpt-5.5. Swap the model= argument for any model your key can call (e.g. gpt-5.4-mini for cheaper batch evaluations).
• All rows return the same label. Your prompt template isn’t differentiating cases. Make sure each row’s {input}/{output}/{reference} columns expose enough context for the judge to discriminate, and that choices lists every label your prompt asks the LLM to emit.
• Some rows fail with timeout / rate-limit. Pass max_retries= to evaluate_dataframe(...) (defaults to 3). For large batches, also pass initial_per_second_request_rate=... to LLM(...) to throttle.
• Logging results back to Arize AX. This guide stops at producing the eval DataFrame. To attach those evals to existing spans in an Arize AX project, use log_evaluations_sync on arize.Client.
• Using Azure OpenAI instead. Pass sync_client_kwargs={"azure_endpoint": ..., "api_version": ...} to LLM(...). The same evaluator code works against an Azure-deployed model.

Resources

Phoenix Evals Documentation

arize-phoenix-evals on PyPI

Phoenix Evals Source

OpenAI Tracing (instrument app calls)